ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2023
Voxel-S-value methods adapted to heterogeneous media for quantitative Y-90 microsphere radioembolization dosimetry.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and validation of a deep learning GAN for predictingJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Optimizing dosimetry in Y-90 microsphere radioembolization: GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulation versus conventional methods for high-volume setting.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Automatic bone marrow segmentation for precise [Medical physics · 2025Article
- Linear Boltzmann equation solver for voxel-level dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapy: Comparison with Monte Carlo and kernel convolution.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Voxel-S-Value based 3D treatment planning methods for Y-90 microspheres radioembolization based on Tc-99m-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe absorbed dose estimation from Voxel-S-Value (VSV) method in heterogeneous media is suboptimal as VSVs are calculated in homogeneous media. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate new VSV methods in order to enhance the accuracy of Y-90 microspheres absorbed dose estimation in liver, lungs, tumors and lung-liver interface regions.
methodsTen patients with Y-90 microspheres SPECT/CT and PET/CT data, six of whom had additional Tc-99m-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT data, were analyzed from the Deep Blue Data Repository. Seven existing VSV methods along with three newly proposed VSV methods were evaluated: liver and lung kernel with center voxel scaling (LiLuCK), liver kernel with density correction and lung kernel with center voxel scaling (LiKDLuCK), liver kernel with center voxel scaling and lung kernel with density correction (LiCKLuKD). Monte Carlo (MC) results were regarded as the gold standard. Absolute absorbed dose errors (%AADE) of these methods for the liver, lungs, tumors, upper liver, and lower lungs were assessed.
resultsLiver and tumor's median %AADE of all methods were <3% for three types of imaging data. In the lungs, however, three recently proposed VSV methods provided median %AADEs of less than 7%, whereas the differences exceeded 20% for existing methods that did not use a lung kernel. LiCKLuKD could achieve median %AADE <2% in the liver, upper liver and tumors, and median %AADE <7% in the lungs and lower lungs in three types of data.
conclusionAll methods are consistent with MC in the liver and tumors. Methods with tissue-specific kernel and effective correction achieve smaller errors in lungs. LiCKLuKD has comparable results with MC in absorbed dose estimation of Y-90 radioembolization for all target regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.