Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36535829›Full record

ArticleTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2023

Comparison of platelet antibody screen, crossmatching and HLA antibody testing in patients refractory to platelet transfusions.

James M Chapman, Linder Wendt, C Michael Knudson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James M ChapmanDeGowin Blood Center, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Linder WendtBiostatistician with the Institute for Clinical and Translation Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
C Michael KnudsonDeGowin Blood Center, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: c-knudson@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing recurrent platelet transfusions can become refractory to these transfusions. Platelet antibody screens (Immucor), platelet crossmatching assays (Immucor), and HLA antibody testing are commonly used to test these patients. The relative effectiveness of these tests has not been determined. A higher incidence of strongly positive screen results that did not predict crossmatch results was anecdotally noted. Therefore, the results of the platelet antibody screens and crossmatches were systematically compiled over a 12-year period from 2010 to 2021. Of note, the Immucor Capture-P Ready Screen (platelet antibody) had a recall in March 2013 after which the performance of the test appears to have changed. The positivity rate of the platelet antibody screen increased over the course of the study, and this was statistically significant when analyzing year as a continuous variable and when grouping years by four-year periods (2010-13,2014-17,2018-21). In contrast, platelet crossmatch reactivity decreased slightly throughout this period. During the 2018-21 period, HLA antibody testing was commonly performed and correlated well with the crossmatch testing but not with the screen. These results suggest that the drastic increase in positivity we observed in the platelet antibody screen over this period is due to increased analytic sensitivity (with possible reduced specificity) of the screen and not a change in our patient population. Based on these results, the platelet antibody screen has little clinical utility and directly performing platelet crossmatching or HLA antibody testing is recommended for patients suspected to be refractory to platelet transfusions due to alloimmune-mediated factors.

Indexed as

HLA AntigensPlatelet TransfusionBlood Grouping and CrossmatchingBlood PlateletsHistocompatibility TestingHumansIsoantibodiesHLA AntigensIsoantibodiesPlatelet antibody screeenPlatelet refractoryPlateletsPlatelet transfusion

Identifiers

PMID36535829
PMCPMC10256835
OpenAlexW4312018545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.