ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023
The Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Object Recognition for Natural Images and Line Drawings.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic image perturbations reveal persistent gaps between human and machine vision.iScience · 2026Article
- A large-scale heterogeneous 3D magnetic resonance brain imaging dataset for self-supervised learning.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Prewired static visual receptive fields for environment-agnostic perception.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- A 7T fMRI dataset of synthetic images for out-of-distribution modeling of vision.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Computational single-neuron mechanisms of visual object coding in the human temporal lobe.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Drawings of THINGS: A large-scale drawing dataset of 1854 object concepts.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Review
- The Scope and Limits of Fine-Grained Image and Category Information in the Ventral Visual Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- The multisensory and multidimensional nature of object representation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Spatiotemporal Properties of Common Semantic Categories for Words and Pictures.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Representations of imaginary scenes and their properties in cortical alpha activity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart in photograph form: The Keele Photo Stimulus Set (KPSS).Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Investigating the temporal dynamics and modeling of mid-level feature representations in humans.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drawings offer a simple and efficient way to communicate meaning. While line drawings capture only coarsely how objects look in reality, we still perceive them as resembling real-world objects. Previous work has shown that this perceived similarity is mirrored by shared neural representations for drawings and natural images, which suggests that similar mechanisms underlie the recognition of both. However, other work has proposed that representations of drawings and natural images become similar only after substantial processing has taken place, suggesting distinct mechanisms. To arbitrate between those alternatives, we measured brain responses resolved in space and time using fMRI and MEG, respectively, while human participants (female and male) viewed images of objects depicted as photographs, line drawings, or sketch-like drawings. Using multivariate decoding, we demonstrate that object category information emerged similarly fast and across overlapping regions in occipital, ventral-temporal, and posterior parietal cortex for all types of depiction, yet with smaller effects at higher levels of visual abstraction. In addition, cross-decoding between depiction types revealed strong generalization of object category information from early processing stages on. Finally, by combining fMRI and MEG data using representational similarity analysis, we found that visual information traversed similar processing stages for all types of depiction, yet with an overall stronger representation for photographs. Together, our results demonstrate broad commonalities in the neural dynamics of object recognition across types of depiction, thus providing clear evidence for shared neural mechanisms underlying recognition of natural object images and abstract drawings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.