Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36535766›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Proprioceptive and Visual Feedback Responses in Macaques Exploit Goal Redundancy.

Kevin P Cross, Hui Guang, Stephen H Scott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Kevin P CrossUniversity of North Carolina Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 13kc18@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9820-1043
Hui GuangCentre for Neuroscience Studies.
Stephen H ScottCentre for Neuroscience Studies.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-1843
Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod · FRQueen's University · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

CIHR PJT-159559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common problem in motor control concerns how to generate patterns of muscle activity when there are redundant solutions to attain a behavioral goal. Optimal feedback control is a theory that has guided many behavioral studies exploring how the motor system incorporates task redundancy. This theory predicts that kinematic errors that deviate the limb should not be corrected if one can still attain the behavioral goal. Studies in humans demonstrate that the motor system can flexibly integrate visual and proprioceptive feedback of the limb with goal redundancy within 90 ms and 70 ms, respectively. Here, we show monkeys (

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryPsychomotor PerformanceAnimalsFeedbackGoalsHumansMacaca mulattaMaleMovementUpper ExtremitymacaqueOFCproprioceptionredundancyvision

Identifiers

PMID36535766
PMCPMC9899082
OpenAlexW4311911478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.