ArticleBMJ case reports2022
Intravitreal chemotherapy-induced cataract in retinoblastoma: challenges and outcome.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complex Ocular Adverse Events Following Oxaliplatin Treatment: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Surgical dislocation of the hip without trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of bone tumors around the hip.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A toddler with bilateral retinoblastoma (Rb) received intravenous chemotherapy for advanced tumours in both eyes. The right eye required enucleation due to a poor response, but the left eye was salvaged by additional treatment with intravitreal chemotherapy for tumour vitreous seeds. Though the vitreous seeds regressed, a gradually progressive cataract developed likely due to drug toxicity. On ensuring continued regression of tumour within the eye, cataract extraction was performed. Surgery was uneventful and the child recovered good functional vision in the left eye. Salvaging the eyeball followed by vision restoration through cataract surgery in the only remaining eye of the child necessitated a multidisciplinary approach involving the ocular oncologist, the paediatric medical oncologist and the paediatric ophthalmologist. Ensuring tumour quiescence within the eye clinically before cataract surgery was the most crucial element of management. Additionally, close monitoring of the progress of the cataract to decide when to intervene was also necessary to keep the risk of amblyopia at bay. The patient recovered good functional vision in the left eye after the surgery and remained free of any tumour recurrence or systemic metastasis at 10 months of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.