Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36535713›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Outcome Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery (OMACS): a single-centre prospective cohort study of cardiac surgery patients.

Terrie Walker-Smith, Katherine Joyce, Rachel Maishman, Helena Smartt, Emma Hopkins, Rachel Brierley, Barnaby C Reeves, Chris A Rogers, Gianni D Angelini, Lucy Culliford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes after Perioperative Transient Ischemic Attack Following Cardiac Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Terrie Walker-SmithBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-3705
Katherine JoyceBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5539-7178
Rachel MaishmanBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Helena SmarttBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Emma HopkinsBristol Heart Institute, Univerisity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rachel BrierleyBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Barnaby C ReevesBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5101-9487
Chris A RogersBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gianni D AngeliniBristol Heart Institute, Univerisity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lucy CullifordBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK lucy.culliford@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GBNIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMore than 30 000 cardiac surgery procedures are performed in the UK each year, however, postoperative complications and long-term failure of interventions are common, leading to repeated surgeries. This represents a significant burden on the patient and health service.Routinely, patients are discharged to their general practitioner 6 weeks postoperatively and research studies typically only report short-term outcomes up to 1 year after surgery, together this makes long-term outcomes of cardiac surgery difficult to monitor. Further, traditional research methods have yet to advance understanding of what causes early complications and why surgical interventions fail. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective cohort study will characterise participants undergoing cardiac surgery at baseline, describe short-term, medium-term and long-term health outcomes postoperatively and collect tissue samples.All eligible adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the Bristol Heart Institute, UK will be approached for consent. Recruitment is expected to continue for up to 10 years resulting in the largest cohort of cardiac patients reported to date. Blood, urine and waste tissue samples will be collected during admission. Samples, along with anonymised data, will be used to investigate outcomes and inform predictive models of complications associated with cardiac surgery.Data about the surgical admission will be obtained from hospital databases and medical notes. Participants may be monitored up to 5 years postoperatively using data obtained from NHS digital. Participants will complete health questionnaires 3 months and 12 months postoperatively.The analysis of data and tissue samples to address specific research questions will require separate research protocols and ethical approval. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the East Midlands Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee.Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international meetings. Participants will be informed of results in annual newsletters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN90204321.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresAdultHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesResearch DesignAcute renal failureCardiac surgeryCoronary interventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID36535713
PMCPMC9764648
OpenAlexW4312050546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.