Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36535653›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[Routine Practice Data for Health Care Analyses: Part 3 of the Manual].

Christof Veit, Thomas Bierbaum, Simone Wesselmann, Stephanie Stock, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Christian Apfelbacher, Stefan Benz, Karsten E Dreinhöfer, Michael Hauptmann, Falk Hoffmann and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [What is health services research?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Christof VeitBQS Institut für Qualität und Patientensicherheit GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas BierbaumGeschäftsstelle, Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung, Berlin, Germany.
Simone WesselmannZertifizierung, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft eV, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stephanie StockInstitut für Gesundheitsökonomie, Uniklinik Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Claus-Dieter HeideckeLeitung, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIG), Berlin, Germany.
Christian ApfelbacherInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Otto von Guericke Universitat Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefan BenzKliniken Böblingen, Klinikverbund Südwest GmbH, Sindelfingen, Germany.
Karsten E DreinhöferOrthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Medical Park AG, Berlin, Germany.
Michael HauptmannDepartement für Versorgungsforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
Falk HoffmannDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitut für Community Medicine, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas KaiserRessort Arzneimittelbewertung, Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), Köln, Germany.
Monika Klinkhammer-SchalkeTumorzentrum Regensburg, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael KollerZentrum für Klinische Studien, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Tanja KostujKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Lippe, Lemgo, Germany.
Olaf OrtmannKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Regensburg Fakultät für Medizin, Regensburg, Germany.
Jochen SchmittZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Holger SchünemannCochrane Canada and Mc Master GRADE Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, Research and Methods, Hamilton, Canada.
Max GeraedtsInstitute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEBQS Institut für Qualität und Patientensicherheit (Germany) · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECochrane · CADeutsches Forschungsnetz · DEGerman Cancer Society · DEKlinikum Lippe · DEKlinikverbund Südwest · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of health and health care (hereafter referred to as "health care analyses") usually aim to make transparent the structures, processes, results and interrelationships of health care and to record the degree to which health care systems and their actors have achieved their goals. Health care-related data are an indispensable source of data for many health care analyses. A prerequisite for the examination of a degree of goal achievement is first of all an agreement on those goals that are to be achieved by the system and its substructures, as well as the identification of the determinants of the achievement of the objectives. Primarily it must be examined how safely, effectively and patient-centred systems, facilities and service providers are operating. It also addresses issues of need, accessibility, utilisation, timeliness, appropriateness, patient safety, coordination, continuity, and health economic efficiency and equity of health care. The results of health care include system services (outputs), on the one hand, and results (outcomes), on the other, whereby the results (patient-reported outcomes) and experiences (patient-reported experiences) reported are of particular importance. Health care analyses answer basic questions of health care research: who does what, when, how, why and with which resources and effects in routine health care. Health care analyses thus provide the necessary findings and key figures to further develop health care in order to improve the quality of health care. The applications range from capacity analyses to following innovations up to the concept of regional and supra-regional monitoring of the quality of care given to the population. Given the progress of digitalisation in Health Care, direct data from the care processes will be increasingly available for health care research. This can support care givers significantly if the findings of the studies are applied precisely and correctly within an adequate methodological frame. This can lead to measurable improved health care quality for patients. Data from the process of health care provision have a high potential. Their use needs the same scientific scrutiny as in all other scientific studies.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchCaregiversGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID36535653
PMCPMC10444518
OpenAlexW4312019365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.