Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36535575›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2023

Analysis of coordinated NMR chemical shifts to map allosteric regulatory networks in proteins.

Erin Skeens, George P Lisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin SkeensDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, & Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
George P LisiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, & Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States. Electronic address: george_lisi@brown.edu.

Funding

Unraveling the Allosteric Mechanism of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor with Molecular ResolutionR01GM144451 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE LISI · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exquisite sensitivity of the NMR chemical shift to local environment makes it an ideal probe to assess atomic level perturbations in proteins of all sizes and structural compositions. Recent advances in solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy of biomolecules have leveraged the chemical shift to report on short- and long-range couplings between individual amino acids to establish "networks" of residues that form the basis of allosteric pathways that transmit chemical signals through the protein matrix to induce functional responses. The simple premise that thermodynamically and functionally coupled regions of a protein (i.e. active and allosteric sites) should be reciprocally sensitive to structural or dynamic perturbations has enabled NMR spectroscopy, the premier method for molecular resolution of protein structural fluctuations, to occupy a place at the forefront of investigations into protein allostery. Here, we detail several key methods of NMR chemical shift analysis to extract mechanistic information about long-range chemical signaling in a protein, focusing on practical methodological aspects and the circumstances under which a given approach would be relevant. We also detail some of the experimental considerations that should be made when applying these methods to specific protein systems.

Indexed as

ProteinsAllosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProteinsAllosteryChemical shiftsReciprocity

Identifiers

PMID36535575
PMCPMC10173519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.