ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Integrative chromatin domain annotation through graph embedding of Hi-C data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CDACHIE: chromatin domain annotation by integrating chromatin interaction and epigenomic data with contrastive learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Genome wide clustering on integrated chromatin states and Micro-C contacts reveals chromatin interaction signatures.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe organization of the genome into domains plays a central role in gene expression and other cellular activities. Researchers identify genomic domains mainly through two views: 1D functional assays such as ChIP-seq, and chromatin conformation assays such as Hi-C. Fully understanding domains requires integrative modeling that combines these two views. However, the predominant form of integrative modeling uses segmentation and genome annotation (SAGA) along with the rigid assumption that loci in contact are more likely to share the same domain type, which is not necessarily true for epigenomic domain types and genome-wide chromatin interactions.
resultsHere, we present an integrative approach that annotates domains using both 1D functional genomic signals and Hi-C measurements of genome-wide 3D interactions without the use of a pairwise prior. We do so by using a graph embedding to learn structural features corresponding to each genomic region, then inputting learned structural features along with functional genomic signals to a SAGA algorithm. We show that our domain types recapitulate well-known subcompartments with an additional granularity that distinguishes a combination of the spatial and functional states of the genomic regions. In particular, we identified a division of the previously identified A2 subcompartment such that the divided domain types have significantly varying expression levels. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/nedashokraneh/IChDA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.