Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534809›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Implications of anomalous relative sea-level rise for the peopling of Remote Oceania.

Juliet P Sefton, Andrew C Kemp, Simon E Engelhart, Joanna C Ellison, Makan A Karegar, Blair Charley, Mark D McCoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliet P SeftonDepartment of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.ORCID 0000-0001-7063-6029
Andrew C KempDepartment of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
Simon E EngelhartDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4431-4664
Joanna C EllisonSchool of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7520, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0692-8347
Makan A KaregarInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115 Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7120-0649
Blair CharleyKosrae Island Resource Management Authority, Kosrae State Government, Tofol, Kosrae 82F5+XG6, Federated States of Micronesia.
Mark D McCoyDepartment of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 76275.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning ~3,500 to 3,300 y B.P., humans voyaged into Remote Oceania. Radiocarbon-dated archaeological evidence coupled with cultural, linguistic, and genetic traits indicates two primary migration routes: a Southern Hemisphere and a Northern Hemisphere route. These routes are separated by low-lying, equatorial atolls that were settled during secondary migrations ~1,000 y later after their exposure by relative sea-level fall from a mid-Holocene highstand. High volcanic islands in the Federated States of Micronesia (Pohnpei and Kosrae) also lie between the migration routes and settlement is thought to have occurred during the secondary migrations despite having been above sea level during the initial settlement of Remote Oceania. We reconstruct relative sea level on Pohnpei and Kosrae using radiocarbon-dated mangrove sediment and show that, rather than falling, there was a ~4.3-m rise over the past ~5,700 y. This rise, likely driven by subsidence, implies that evidence for early settlement could lie undiscovered below present sea level. The potential for earlier settlement invites reinterpretation of migration pathways into Remote Oceania and monument building. The UNESCO World Heritage sites of Nan Madol (Pohnpei) and Leluh (Kosrae) were constructed when relative sea level was ~0.94 m (~770 to 750 y B.P.) and ~0.77 m (~640 to 560 y B.P.) lower than present, respectively. Therefore, it is unlikely that they were originally constructed as islets separated by canals filled with ocean water, which is their prevailing interpretation. Due to subsidence, we propose that these islands and monuments are more vulnerable to future relative sea-level rise than previously identified.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSea Level RiseArchaeologyHumansMicronesiaOceaniaarchaeologymangroveMicronesiaOceaniasea level

Identifiers

PMID36534809
PMCPMC9907147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.