Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534678›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Family caregivers' perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study.

Mary T Fox, Jeffrey I Butler, Souraya Sidani, Manal M Alzghoul, Mark Skinner, Travis Amell, Mary Ferguson-Paré

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary T FoxSchool of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0572-3892
Jeffrey I ButlerSchool of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Souraya SidaniFaculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Manal M AlzghoulSchool of Nursing, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Mark SkinnerTrent School of the Environment, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Travis AmellSchool of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mary Ferguson-ParéSchool of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
York University · CALakehead University · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CATrent University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a critical need for hospital-to-home transitional care interventions to prepare family caregivers for patients' post-discharge care in rural communities. Four evidence-based interventions (named discharge planning, treatments, warning signs, and physical activity) have the potential to meet this need but family caregivers' perspectives on the acceptability of the interventions have not been examined. This gap is significant because unacceptable interventions are unlikely to be used or used as designed, thereby undermining outcome achievement. Accordingly, this study examined the perceived acceptability of the four interventions to rural family caregivers. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multi-method descriptive design was used. The quantitative method entailed the administration of an established scale to assess the interventions' perceived acceptability to family caregivers. The qualitative method involved semi-structured interviews to explore family caregivers' perceived acceptability of the interventions in greater depth, including acceptable and unacceptable aspects, in the context of their own transitional care experience. Participants were the family caregivers of a relative who had been discharged home in a rural community from an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada.

resultsThe purposive sample included 16 participants who were mostly middle-aged women (n = 14; 87.5%) caring for a parent (n = 9; 56.3%) at high risk for hospital readmission. The mean scores on the acceptability measure were 3 or higher for all interventions, indicating that, on average, the four interventions were perceived as acceptable. In terms of acceptable aspects, four themes were identified: the interventions: 1) involve family caregivers and proactively prepare them for discharge, 2) provide clear, written, and detailed guidance, 3) place the onus on healthcare providers to initiate communication, and 4) ensure post-discharge follow-up. In terms of unacceptable aspects, one theme was identified: the physical activity intervention would be challenging to implement. DISCUSSION: The findings support implementing the four interventions in practice throughout the hospital-to-home transition. Healthcare providers should assess family caregivers' comfort in participating in the physical activity intervention and tailor their role accordingly.

Indexed as

CaregiversTransitional CareAftercareFamilyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOntarioPatient DischargeQualitative ResearchRural Population

Identifiers

PMID36534678
PMCPMC9762580
OpenAlexW4311914241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.