Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534450›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Assessing and Promoting Cardiovascular Health for Adolescent Women: User-Centered Design Approach.

Kolbi Bradley, Santiago J Arconada Alvarez, Amanda K Gilmore, Morgan Greenleaf, Aayahna Herbert, Melissa J Kottke, Maren Parsell, Sierra Patterson, Tymirra Smith, Mercedes Sotos-Prieto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Kolbi BradleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-5275
Santiago J Arconada Alvarez *Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-6679
Amanda K Gilmore *Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-9206
Morgan Greenleaf *Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1569-5696
Aayahna Herbert *College of Computing, School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-3914
Melissa J Kottke *Jane Fonda Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8522-2758
Maren Parsell *Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-7912
Sierra Patterson *Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-7125
Tymirra Smith *College of Design, School of Industrial Design, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4207-0264
Mercedes Sotos-Prieto *Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-2586
Elizabeth ZeichnerEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-0826
Holly C Gooding *Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3145-5791
Emory University · USAtlanta Technical College · USComputing Center · RUEmory Healthcare · USGeorgia State University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Training GrantT32HL007055 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Wayne D. Rosamond · 1986 to 2026
$10.0M
Incorporating cardiovascular risk assessment into adolescent and young adult visits to improve cardiovascular healthR03HL155253 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GOODING, HOLLY CATHERINE · 2021 to 2022
$148k
NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL155253NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among women in the United States. A considerable number of young women already have risk factors for CVD. Awareness of CVD and its risk factors is critical to preventing CVD, yet younger women are less aware of CVD prevalence, its risk factors, and preventative behaviors compared to older women.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to assess CVD awareness among adolescent and young adult women and develop a lifestyle-based cardiovascular risk assessment tool for the promotion of CVD awareness among this population.

methodsThis study used a 3-phase iterative design process with young women and health care practitioners from primary care and reproductive care clinics in Atlanta, Georgia. In phase 1, we administered a modified version of the American Heart Association Women's Health Survey to young women, aged 15-24 years (n=67), to assess their general CVD awareness. In phase 2, we interviewed young women, aged 13-21 years (n=10), and their health care practitioners (n=10), to solicit suggestions for adapting the Healthy Heart Score, an existing adult cardiovascular risk assessment tool, for use with this age group. We also aimed to learn more about the barriers and challenges to health behavior change within this population and the clinical practices that serve them. In phase 3, we used the findings from the first 2 phases to create a prototype of a new online cardiovascular risk assessment tool designed specifically for young women. We then used an iterative user-centered design process to collect feedback from approximately 105 young women, aged 13-21 years, as we adapted the tool.

resultsOnly 10.5% (7/67) of the young women surveyed correctly identified CVD as the leading cause of death among women in the United States. Few respondents reported having discussed their personal risk (4/67, 6%) or family history of CVD (8/67, 11.9%) with a health care provider. During the interviews, young women reported better CVD awareness and knowledge after completing the adult risk assessment tool and suggested making the tool more teen-friendly by incorporating relevant foods and activity options. Health care practitioners emphasized shortening the assessment for easier use within practice and discussed other barriers adolescents may face in adopting heart-healthy behaviors. The result of the iterative design process was a youth-friendly prototype of a cardiovascular risk assessment tool.

conclusionsAdolescent and young adult women demonstrate low awareness of CVD. This study illustrates the potential value of a cardiovascular risk assessment tool adapted for use with young women and showcases the importance of user-centered design when creating digital health interventions.

Indexed as

adolescentassessment toolcardiovascular diseaseCVDdigital health interventionheart diseasemHealthrisk assessmentuser-centered designwomen's healthyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36534450
PMCPMC9808721
OpenAlexW4312018562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.