Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534419›Full record

ReviewPathologica2022

Adult type diffuse gliomas in the new 2021 WHO Classification.

Manila Antonelli, Pietro Luigi Poliani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cancers · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manila AntonelliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Pietro Luigi PolianiPathology Units, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult-type diffuse gliomas represent a group of highly infiltrative central nervous system tumors with a prognosis that significantly varies depending on the specific subtype and histological grade. Traditionally, adult-type diffuse gliomas have been classified based on their morphological features with a great interobserver variability and discrepancy in patient survival even within the same histological grade. Over the last few decades, advances in molecular profiling have drastically changed the diagnostic approach and classification of brain tumors leading to the development of an integrated morphological and molecular classification endowed with a more clinically relevant value. These concepts were largely anticipated in the revised fourth-edition of WHO classification of central nervous system tumors published in 2016. The fifth-edition (WHO 2021) moved molecular diagnostics forward into a full integration of molecular parameters with the histological features into an integrative diagnostic approach. Diagnosis of adult type diffuse gliomas, IDH mutant and IDH-wildtype has been simplified by introducing revised diagnostic and grading criteria. In this review, we will discuss the most recent updates to the classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas and summarize the essential diagnostic keys providing a practical guidance to pathologists.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsGliomaAdultHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationWorld Health OrganizationIsocitrate DehydrogenaseastrocytomaglioblastomaIDH mutantIDH-WT

Identifiers

PMID36534419
PMCPMC9763975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.