ArticleJAMA network open2022
Assessment of Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences and Receipt of Behavioral Health Services Among Children and Adolescents.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring diverse applications of team-based care in preventive medicine: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Provider and Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Screening for Research on Early Life Adversity.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025Article
- Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: Is "Social Drivers of Health (SDoH) Screening" Sufficient?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Testing a multi-faceted strategy to support the implementation of ACEs screenings in primary care: results of a stepped-wedge pilot trial.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Adverse childhood experiences screening in pediatric primary care and changes in the rate of visits to social work and behavioral health.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences: A Critical Appraisal.Pediatrics · 2024Review
- Caregiver Report of Adverse Childhood Events: Comparison of Self-Administered and Telephone Questionnaires.Children and youth services review · 2024Article
- Adverse Childhood Experiences and Trajectories of Firearm Exposure in Childhood.The Journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening in Pediatrics and Obstetrics Settings.The Permanente journal · 2024Article
- The effect of adverse childhood experience training, screening, and response in primary care: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Review
- Conceptualizing adverse childhood experiences as a latent factor: Tests of measurement invariance across five racial and ethnic groups.Child developmentArticle
- Advocating for Our Children: An Initiative Utilizing Verbal and Video Education to Increase Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire Form Response Rate.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in primary care settings has been increasing as a response to the overwhelming and consistent evidence of the deleterious associations between ACEs and later physical and mental health. However, there is little empirical guidance on the appropriate implementation of ACEs screening in pediatric primary care. Objective: To test the use of a pilot intervention for ACEs screening and referral on the receipt of behavioral health care for children and adolescents within a large integrated health care delivery system. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a large integrated health care system serving Southern California. Child and adolescent members of the target health care system younger than 18 years between July 1, 2018, and November 30, 2021, who received a positive screening for ACEs at the pilot clinic were included. This pilot clinic implemented an intervention that included additional screening questions and incorporated social workers into the process of evaluation and referral for behavioral health needs following ACEs screening. Exposures: ACEs screening. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visit to a behavioral health care service within 90 days of a positive ACEs screen determined as a score of 1 or higher and behavioral symptoms. Results: The cohort consisted of 4030 children (mean [SD] age, 9.94 [4.55] years) with positive ACEs screening, 48% adolescents (11-17.99 years), approximately equal gender (51% females), 73% Hispanic, and 33% with Medicaid insurance. After the intervention, children were more likely to have a behavioral health services visit within 90 days of the screening than before the intervention (from 4.33% to 32.48%; incidence rate ratio, 7.50; 95% CI, 1.55-36.2). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the implementation of a new ACEs screening and referral process was associated with increased receipt of behavioral health services among children with a positive ACEs screening. This could be useful strategy for other health care systems responding to state and local mandates to screen and provide care for children with ACEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.