Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534387›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2023

Effect of Saline vs Gluconate/Acetate-Buffered Solution vs Lactate-Buffered Solution on Serum Chloride Among Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: The SPLYT-P Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sainath Raman, Kristen S Gibbons, Adrian Mattke, Andreas Schibler, Peter Trnka, Melanie Kennedy, Renate Le Marsney, Luregn J Schlapbach

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. REstrictive versus StandarD FlUid Management in Mechanically Ventilated ChildrEn Admitted to PICU: a pilot randomized controlled trial (REDUCE-1).Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Resuscitation in paediatric septic shock using vitamin C and hydrocortisone (RESPOND): The RESPOND randomised controlled trial statistical analysis plan.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Saline versus balanced crystalloids for hydration post-kidney biopsy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group (ANZICS PSG): 20 Years of Collaborative Research.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  13. Management of Pediatric Parenteral Fluids.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sainath RamanChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kristen S GibbonsChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Adrian MattkeChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andreas SchiblerWesley Medical Research, Critical Care Research Group, St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia.
Peter TrnkaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Melanie KennedyChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Renate Le MarsneyChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Luregn J SchlapbachChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Most children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) receive intravenous fluids. A recent systematic review suggested mortality benefit in critically ill adults treated with balanced solutions compared with sodium chloride, 0.9% (saline). There is a lack of clinically directive data on optimal fluid choice in critically ill children. Objective: To determine if balanced solutions decrease the rise of plasma chloride compared with saline, 0.9%, in critically ill children. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, 3-arm, open-label randomized clinical trial took place in a 36-bed PICU. Children younger than 16 years admitted to the PICU and considered to require intravenous fluid therapy by the treating clinician were eligible. Children were screened from November 2019 to April 2021. Interventions: Enrolled children were 1:1:1 allocated to gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, or saline as intravenous fluids. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was an increase in serum chloride of 5 mEq/L or more within 48 hours from randomization. New-onset acute kidney injury, length of hospital and intensive care stay, and intensive care-free survival were secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 516 patients with a median (IQR) age of 3.8 (1.0-10.4) years were randomized with 178, 171, and 167 allocated to gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, and saline, respectively. The serum chloride level increased 5 mEq/L or more in 37 patients (25.2%), 34 patients (23.9%), and 58 patients (40.0%) in the gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, and saline groups. The odds of a rise in plasma chloride 5 mEq/L or more was halved with the use of gluconate/acetate-buffered solution compared with saline (odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.31-0.83]; P = .007) and with the use of lactate-buffered solution compared with saline (odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.28-0.79]; P = .004). New-onset acute kidney injury was observed in 10 patients (6.1%), 6 patients (3.7%), and 5 patients (3.2%) in the gluconate/acetate-buffered solution, lactate-buffered solution, and saline groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Balanced solutions (gluconate/acetate-buffered solution and lactate-buffered solution) administered as intravenous fluid therapy reduced the incidence of rise in plasma chloride compared with saline in children in PICU. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12619001244190.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySaline SolutionAdultChildChild, PreschoolChloridesCritical IllnessFluid TherapyGluconatesHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricLactic AcidChloridesGluconatesLactic AcidSaline Solution

Identifiers

PMID36534387
PMCPMC9857166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.