Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534295›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2023

Implicit bias instruction across disciplines related to the social determinants of health: a scoping review.

Cristina M Gonzalez, Chavon M Onumah, Sydney A Walker, Elisa Karp, Rachel Schwartz, Monica L Lypson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina M GonzalezInstitute for Excellence in Health Equity, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Cristina.Gonzalez@nyulangone.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9779-6548
Chavon M OnumahDepartment of Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Sydney A WalkerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Elisa KarpDepartment of Pediatrics, North Central Bronx Hospital, Bronx, NY, USA.
Rachel SchwartzAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-3819
Monica L LypsonColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1450-9380

Funding

Does Implicit Bias Influence Medical Decision-Making? Developing and Validating Novel Models and Outcome MetricsK23MD014178 · NIMHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GONZALEZ, CRISTINA M · 2019 to 2023
$853k
NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD014178NIMHD NIH HHS K23MD014178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One criticism of published curricula addressing implicit bias is that few achieve skill development in implicit bias recognition and management (IBRM). To inform the development of skills-based curricula addressing IBRM, we conducted a scoping review of the literature inquiring, "What interventions exist focused on IBRM in professions related to social determinants of health: education, law, social work, and the health professions inclusive of nursing, allied health professions, and medicine?"Authors searched eight databases for articles published from 2000 to 2020. Included studies: (1) described interventions related to implicit bias; and (2) addressed knowledge, attitude and/or skills as outcomes. Excluded were interventions solely focused on reducing/neutralizing implicit bias. Article review for inclusion and data charting occurred independently and in duplicate. Investigators compared characteristics across studies; data charting focused on educational and assessment strategies. Fifty-one full-text articles for data charting and synthesis, with more than 6568 learners, were selected. Educational strategies included provocative/engagement triggers, the Implicit Association Test, reflection and discussion, and various active learning strategies. Most assessments were self-report, with fewer objective measures. Eighteen funded studies utilized federal, foundation, institutional, and private sources. This review adds to the literature by providing tangible examples of curricula to complement existing frameworks, and identifying opportunities for further research in innovative skills-based instruction, learner assessment, and development and validation of outcome metrics. Continued research addressing IBRM would enable learners to develop and practice skills to recognize and manage their implicit biases during clinical encounters, thereby advancing the goal of improved, equitable patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Bias, ImplicitSocial Determinants of HealthCurriculumHealth OccupationsHumansProblem-Based LearningCurriculum developmentHealth disparitiesHealth equityImplicit biasScoping review

Identifiers

PMID36534295
PMCPMC11491112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.