Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534219›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2022

Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related dry eye disease (DED): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yahui Lei, Jing Peng, Jiayan Liu, Jingxiang Zhong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yahui Lei *Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing Peng *Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayan LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingxiang ZhongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. zjx85221206@126.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and conventional treatments in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related dry eye disease (DED). A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) up to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A meta-analysis concerning changes in tear break-up time (BUT), changes in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, changes in non-invasively measured tear break-up time (NIBUT), changes in corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining (CFS) scores, and changes in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores was carried out. The initial search identified a total of 1842 records in the databases, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis. Compared to conventional therapies, IPL therapy was associated with significantly reduced OSDI (MD, - 7.49; 95% CI, - 12.47 to - 2.5) and SPEED (MD, - 3.28; 95% CI, - 5.64 to - 0.93) scores, while BUT (MD, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.19 ~ 2.69) and NIBUT (MD, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.07 ~ 4.04) significantly increased. No significant difference was found in the change in CFS between the two groups. Both IPL treatment and traditional treatments are effective in the treatment of MGD-related DED. IPL application seems to be superior to traditional treatments.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesIntense Pulsed Light TherapyMeibomian Gland DysfunctionFluoresceinHumansMeibomian GlandsFluoresceinDry eye diseaseIntense pulsed lightMeibomian gland dysfunctionTherapy

Identifiers

PMID36534219
OpenAlexW4312065772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.