Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534169›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023

[Diagnostics and treatment of organic intraorbital foreign bodies].

Christoph Holtmann, Mathias B Roth, Rotem S Lanzman, Bernd Turowski, Gerald Antoch, Colin R Mackenzie, Maria Borrelli, Gerd Geerling

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph HoltmannMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. Christoph.Holtmann@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Mathias B RothMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Rotem S LanzmanMedizinische Fakultät, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Bernd TurowskiMedizinische Fakultät, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Gerald AntochMedizinische Fakultät, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Colin R MackenzieMedizinische Fakultät, Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Krankenhaushygiene, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Maria BorrelliMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Gerd GeerlingMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEOphthalmology Clinic · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrbital injuries with organic foreign bodies are a clinical challenge as they can cause a variety of complications and sometimes lead to irreversible visual impairment. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe report five consecutive cases of patients with organic orbital foreign bodies who presented between 2012 and 2022. Documented parameters include age, gender, time of injury, mechanism of injury, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), presence of pain, restriction of motility, performed imaging, location and type of foreign body, treatment and complications.

resultsThe mean patient age was 61.8 ± 32.3 years and the gender ratio was 4:1 (female:male). In 4 cases the injury had been reported on average 4.6 days (0/14 days min/max) previously. Best corrected visual acuity at first presentation was 0.5 ± 0.2 decimal and after a mean follow-up of 12.7 months (0.5/38 months min/max) at last presentation 0.67 ± 0.3 decimal (p = 0.2). The reason for initial presentation was pain (n = 3) and/or double vision (n = 2). All patients underwent computer tomography (CT). The diagnosis was confirmed in two cases by means of CT. In all five cases the foreign body material could be completely surgically removed, while one patient needed repeated surgery due to retained foreign body material. The organic foreign body material included wood (4) and wax (1). In two cases, a foreign body-induced infection was successfully treated with systemic antibiotics. There were no other complications.

conclusionIn orbital trauma a thorough wound exploration must be performed, especially if the mechanism of injury is uncertain and residual foreign bodies or a perforation injury cannot be excluded. The imaging of choice is CT, which may have to be performed again in the postoperative course.

Indexed as

Eye Foreign BodiesOrbital DiseasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrbitPainTomography, X-Ray ComputedVisual AcuityOculoplasticOrbitOrbitotomyOrganic foreign bodiesTrauma

Identifiers

PMID36534169
OpenAlexW4311928125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.