Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534153›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Bladder EpiCheck urine test in the follow-up of NMIBC: a cost analysis.

Marlène Charlotte Henrique Hekman, Stan Robert Willem Wijn, Yair Lotan, Tim Martin Govers, Johannes Alfred Witjes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marlène Charlotte Henrique HekmanDepartment of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. marlenehekman@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-3924
Stan Robert Willem WijnDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Tim Martin GoversDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes Alfred WitjesDepartment of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the Netherlands yearly more than 5000 patients are diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). With a specificity of 88.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) for high grade NMIBC of 99.3%, the Bladder EpiCheck (BE) urine test may be used in NMIBC to reduce the burden of follow-up cystoscopies.

methodsIn this study a cost analysis of the BE follow-up strategy in the Dutch healthcare system was performed. In half of the follow-up appointments, BE was used as a rule-in for cystoscopy. In addition, the possible delay in recurrence detection was estimated. A cost calculation tool was developed using Microsoft Excel.

resultsThe BE strategy results in an estimated cost reduction of 8%, 4% and 9% in low, intermediate and high risk patients, respectively. In the Netherlands this may result in a cost reduction of approximately 1.6 million euro per year. The estimated delay in the detection of recurrent disease would be 3.9, 1.7 and 1.3 months in low, intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients respectively.

conclusionTo conclude, the BE can be used to reduce the costs of NMIBC follow-up, with a small delay in diagnosis of recurrent disease.

Indexed as

Urinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCosts and Cost AnalysisCystoscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersBladder cancerCost analysisMonitoring

Identifiers

PMID36534153
OpenAlexW4311932975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.