Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36534151›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.

Claudia Kesch, Vlad Pantea, Timo Soeterik, Alessandro Marquis, Giulia la Bombarda, Allesandro Morlacco, Francesco Barletta, Jan Philipp Radtke, Christopher Darr, Felix Preisser and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Claudia KeschDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Claudia.Kesch@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-2664
Vlad PanteaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Timo SoeterikDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein-Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alessandro MarquisDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giulia la BombardaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Allesandro MorlaccoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Francesco BarlettaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Jan Philipp RadtkeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Christopher DarrDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Felix PreisserDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Fabio ZattoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Giancarlo MarraDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Roderik C N van den BerghDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein-Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Boris HadaschikDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Giorgio GandagliaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
EAU-YAU Prostate Cancer Working Party

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough active surveillance (AS) is recommended for low- to favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy (RP) is not negligible. Available studies based on systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy might not be applicable to contemporary cohorts diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy (TB). The aim of the present study is to explore rates and risk factors for adverse outcomes (AO) at RP in patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa detected at TB with concomitant systematic biopsy (SB).

methodsMulticenter, retrospective analysis of 475 consecutive patients with ISUP ≤ 2 PCa at MRI-TB + SB is treated with RP. AO were defined as ISUP upgrading, adverse pathology (upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and/or ≥ pT3 at RP, and/or pN1) (AP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men with follow-up (n = 327).

resultsThe rate of ISUP upgrading, upgrading ≥ 3, and AP were 39%, 21%, and 43%. Compared to ISUP2, men with ISUP1 PCa had a higher rate of overall upgrading (27 vs. 67%, p < 0.001), but less upgrading to ≥ 3 (27 vs. 10%, p < 0.001). AP was more common when ISUP2 was detected with a combined MRI-TB + SB approach compared to considering TB (p = 0.02) or SB (p = 0.01) alone. PSA, PSA density, PI-RADS, ISUP at TB, overall biopsy ISUP and EAU classification were predictors of upgrading to ISUP ≥ 3 and AP. The 1 year BCR-free survival was 94% with no differences in BCR rates between subgroups.

conclusionUpgrading in ISUP ≤ 2 PCa remains prevalent even in men diagnosed in the MRI era. The use of MRI-TB with concomitant SB allows for the accurate identification of ISUP2 PCa and predicts the risk of AO at RP.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm GradingProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenActive surveillanceISUPOutcomesProstate cancerRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID36534151
PMCPMC9947075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.