Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36533958›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2023

Update on Novel Taxa and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacteria Isolated from Nondomestic Animals Described in 2018 to 2021.

Sara D Lawhon, Claire R Burbick, Erik Munson, Amanda Zapp, Elizabeth Thelen, Maia Villaflor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara D LawhonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9154-8909
Claire R BurbickDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Erik MunsonDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-6643
Amanda ZappDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Elizabeth ThelenDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Maia VillaflorDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revisions and new additions to bacterial taxonomy can have a significant widespread impact on clinical practice, infectious disease epidemiology, veterinary microbiology laboratory operations, and wildlife conservation efforts. The expansion of genome sequencing technologies has revolutionized our knowledge of the microbiota of humans, animals, and insects. Here, we address novel taxonomy and nomenclature revisions of veterinary significance that impact bacteria isolated from nondomestic wildlife, with emphasis being placed on bacteria that are associated with disease in their hosts or were isolated from host animal species that are culturally significant, are a target of conservation efforts, or serve as reservoirs for human pathogens.

Indexed as

Animals, WildMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaHumansbacterial taxonomyveterinary microbiology

Identifiers

PMID36533958
PMCPMC9945507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.