ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Match Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Training: 2010 to 2021.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and Success of Internal Medicine Applicants to Subspecialty Fellowships.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing Supply, Demand, and Adequacy of Cardiologists in the United States: Projecting a National Shortage.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- The Fellowship of the Little Hearts: A 16-Year Analysis of Pediatric Cardiology Match Outcomes.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Paving a Path Forward After an Unsuccessful GI Fellowship Match.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Analysis of application and match rates for clinical cardiac electrophysiology training in the United States.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- A Decade in Print: The Evolving Academic Benchmark of Cardiology Fellowship Applications.Cureus · 2025Article
- Demographic variations and temporal trends in hospice and palliative care fellowship matches in the United States.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study elucidates recent trends in application and match rates in the Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Match. We hypothesized that (1) match rates have increased with time; (2) match rates are highest for US allopathic graduates; and (3) most candidates match at 1 of their top 3 ranked fellowship choices. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of all applicants in the Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Match from 2010 to 2021 (n=14 674). Chi-square tests were used to compare trends over time and match rates by applicant archetype (US allopathic graduates and non-US allopathic graduates). The annual number of applicants increased from 1184 to 1575 (33% increase) while training positions increased 718 to 1045 (46% increase) over the study period. The percentage of applicants that matched increased from 61% in 2010 to 66% in 2021 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.