ArticleBiomarker insights2022
Advantages and Limitations of Monitoring Circulating Tumor DNA Levels to Predict the Prognosis of Patients Diagnosed With Gastric Cancer.
Article in Biomarker insights, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Residual Disease Detection and Postoperative Surveillance in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing for Early Diagnosis and Detection of Treatment Response, Minimal Residual Disease, and Recurrence in Gastroesophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Role of circulating tumor DNA methylation in gastric cancer initiation and progression: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: A snapshot of the current state of the art.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Comparison of the mutation patterns between tumor tissue and cell-free DNA in stage IV gastric cancer.Aging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing-based genomic profiling facilitates biomarker detection by cell-free DNA (cfDNA) liquid biopsy. However, the efficiency of mutation calling and the prognostic value of cfDNA biomarkers are disputed. We investigated 24 patients with gastric cancer in this study, using a 605-gene sequencing panel to sequence their plasma cfDNA and tumor tissue DNA. The mutation concordance between plasma cfDNA and tumor tissue DNA was 70.6% in stage IV gastric cancer and 30.2% in stage III gastric cancer, indicating insufficient mutation detection rates in stage III and early-stage cancer. When compared with total cfDNA load and blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB), the variant allele frequencies (VAF) of commonly mutated genes are highly accurate in representing disease burden. Further, VAF are a better prognostic indicator compared with serum biomarkers including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The use of cfDNA in molecular profiling of patients allows prediction of patient survival and clinical response, as well as the development of personalized therapy regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.