Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36533196›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Backcasting COVID-19: a physics-informed estimate for early case incidence.

G A Kevrekidis, Z Rapti, Y Drossinos, P G Kevrekidis, M A Barmann, Q Y Chen, J Cuevas-Maraver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G A KevrekidisDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-0626
Z RaptiDepartment of Mathematics and Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3988-0888
Y DrossinosEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8059-9636
P G KevrekidisDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7714-3689
M A BarmannDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Q Y ChenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2317-9296
J Cuevas-MaraverGrupo de Física No Lineal, Departamento de Física Aplicada I, Universidad de Sevilla. Escuela Politécnica Superior, C/ Virgen de África, 7, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7162-5759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the number of reported cases during the first stages of the COVID-19 pandemic severely underestimates the number of actual cases. We leverage delay embedding theorems of Whitney and Takens and use Gaussian process regression to estimate the number of cases during the first 2020 wave based on the second wave of the epidemic in several European countries, South Korea and Brazil. We assume that the second wave was more accurately monitored, even though we acknowledge that behavioural changes occurred during the pandemic and region- (or country-) specific monitoring protocols evolved. We then construct a manifold diffeomorphic to that of the implied original dynamical system, using fatalities or hospitalizations only. Finally, we restrict the diffeomorphism to the reported cases coordinate of the dynamical system. Our main finding is that in the European countries studied, the actual cases are under-reported by as much as 50%. On the other hand, in South Korea-which had a proactive mitigation approach-a far smaller discrepancy between the actual and reported cases is predicted, with an approximately 18% predicted underestimation. We believe that our backcasting framework is applicable to other epidemic outbreaks where (due to limited or poor quality data) there is uncertainty around the actual cases.

Indexed as

COVID-19embedding theoremsepidemicsGaussian processtime series

Identifiers

PMID36533196
PMCPMC9748501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.