Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36533157›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2022

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology.

Lucas Porcello Schilling, Marcio Luiz Figueredo Balthazar, Márcia Radanovic, Orestes Vicente Forlenza, Marcela Lima Silagi, Jerusa Smid, Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa, Norberto Anízio Ferreira Frota, Leonardo Cruz de Souza, Francisco Assis Carvalho Vale and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lucas Porcello SchillingPontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9923-6982
Marcio Luiz Figueredo BalthazarUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4780-444X
Márcia RadanovicUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-6962-6397
Orestes Vicente ForlenzaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9923-5899
Marcela Lima SilagiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0721-8638
Jerusa SmidUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9513-0964
Breno José Alencar Pires BarbosaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4333-2024
Norberto Anízio Ferreira FrotaHospital Geral de Fortaleza, Serviço de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-5664
Leonardo Cruz de SouzaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte MG, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5027-9722
Francisco Assis Carvalho ValeUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Departamento de Medicina, São Carlos SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8826-2010
Paulo CaramelliUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte MG, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4786-6990
Paulo Henrique Ferreira BertolucciUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7902-7502
Márcia Lorena Fagundes ChavesHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-1940-4043
Sonia Maria Dozzi BruckiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-6732
Benito Pereira DamascenoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7079-0077
Ricardo NitriniUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5721-1525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the consensus of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging from the Brazilian Academy of Neurology on the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Brazil. The authors conducted a literature review regarding clinical and research criteria for AD diagnosis and proposed protocols for use at primary, secondary, and tertiary care levels. Within this clinical scenario, the diagnostic criteria for typical and atypical AD are presented as well as clinical, cognitive, and functional assessment tools and complementary propaedeutics with laboratory and neuroimaging tests. The use of biomarkers is also discussed for both clinical diagnosis (in specific conditions) and research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaDiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36533157
PMCPMC9745995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.