Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36533109›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2022

Best therapy for the easiest to treat hepatitis C virus genotype 1b-infected patients.

Dorota Zarębska-Michaluk, Michał Brzdęk, Jerzy Jaroszewicz, Magdalena Tudrujek-Zdunek, Beata Lorenc, Jakub Klapaczyński, Włodzimierz Mazur, Adam Kazek, Marek Sitko, Hanna Berak and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pangenotypic tripleClinical and experimental hepatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Dorota Zarębska-MichalukDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce 25-317, Poland. dorota1010@tlen.pl.
Michał BrzdękDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce 25-317, Poland.
Jerzy JaroszewiczDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice 40-055, Poland.
Magdalena Tudrujek-ZdunekDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-059, Poland.
Beata LorencPomeranian Center of Infectious Diseases, Medical University Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-214, Poland.
Jakub KlapaczyńskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warszawa 00-241, Poland.
Włodzimierz MazurClinical Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Chorzów 41-500, Poland.
Adam KazekID Clinic, Mysłowice 41-400, Poland.
Marek SitkoDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Jagiellonian University, Kraków 31-088, Poland.
Hanna BerakHospital for Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Warszawa 02-091, Poland.
Justyna Janocha-LitwinDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University Wrocław, Wrocław 50-367, Poland.
Dorota DybowskaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz 85-030, Poland.
Łukasz SupronowiczDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok 15-089, Poland.
Rafał KrygierInfectious Diseases and Hepatology Outpatient Clinic, Gemini NZOZ, Żychlin 62-571, Poland.
Jolanta CitkoMedical Practice of Infections, Regional Hospital, Olsztyn 10-561, Poland.
Anna PiekarskaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University Łódź, Łódź 90-419, Poland.
Robert FlisiakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok 15-089, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLJan Kochanowski University · PL1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic · PLCentral Clinical Hospital · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNJagiellonian University · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLSt. Luke's Clinic · USUniversity of Computer Sciences and Economics in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe revolution in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection dates back to the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The increase in efficacy was most pronounced in patients infected with genotype (GT) 1b, as this was the most poorly responsive population to treatment during the interferon era.

aimTo identify the most effective interferon-free therapy for GT1b-infected patients and to determine positive and negative predictors of virological response.

methodsThis real-world retrospective analysis included patients chronically infected with GT1b HCV whose data were obtained from the multicenter observational EpiTer-2 database. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated for each therapeutic regimen as the percentage of sustained virological responses (SVR). Assessment of the safety was based on the evaluation of the course of therapy, the occurrence of adverse events including serious ones, deaths during treatment and in the post 12-wk follow-up period.

resultsThe studied population consisted of 11385 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 14.8 years and a female predominance (53.4%). The majority of them were treatment-naïve (74.6%) and patients with cirrhosis accounted for 24.3%. Of the DAA regimens used, 76.9% were GT-specific with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin being the most used option (32.4%). A total of 10903 patients responded to treatment resulting in a 98.1% in the per-protocol analysis after excluding 273 patients without SVR data. The effectiveness of all regimens exceeded 90% and the highest SVR of 98.9% was achieved in patients treated with a combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. Logistic regression analyses showed that the virologic response was independently associated with female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.67], absence of decompensated cirrhosis at baseline (OR = 2.42) and higher baseline platelets (OR = 1.004 per 1000/μL increase), while the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection significantly decreased the odds of response (OR = 0.39). About 95%-100% of patients completed therapy irrespective of the drug regimen. At least one adverse effect occurred in 10.9%-36.3% and most of them were mild. No treatment related deaths have been reported.

conclusionWe documented very high effectiveness and a good safety profile across all DAA regimens. Positive predictors of SVR were female sex, absence of decompensated cirrhosis at baseline and higher platelet count while HIV coinfection reduced the effectiveness.

Indexed as

Hepatitis C, ChronicMacrocyclic CompoundsAdultAgedAntiviral AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGenotypeHepacivirusHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSustained Virologic ResponseValineAntiviral AgentsMacrocyclic CompoundsValineDirect-acting antiviralsGenotype 1bGenotype-specificHepatitis CPangenotypicSustained virologic response

Identifiers

PMID36533109
PMCPMC9753050
OpenAlexW4310536473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.