Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36533087›Full record

ArticleBiological conservation2021

How does the beach ecosystem change without tourists during COVID-19 lockdown?

E H Soto, C M Botero, C B Milanés, A Rodríguez-Santiago, M Palacios-Moreno, E Díaz-Ferguson, Y R Velázquez, A Abbehusen, E Guerra-Castro, N Simoes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological conservation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

E H SotoCentro de Observación Marino para Estudios de Riesgos del Ambiente Costero (COSTAR), Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.
C M BoteroEscuela de Derecho, Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Santa Marta, Colombia.
C B MilanésUniversidad de La Costa, Departamento Civil y Ambiental, Barranquilla, Colombia.
A Rodríguez-SantiagoTaller Ecológico de Puerto Rico, Boquerón, Puerto Rico.
M Palacios-MorenoUniversidad Del Pacífico, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
E Díaz-FergusonEstación Científica Coiba (Coiba AIP), Ciudad del Saber, Clayton, Panamá.
Y R VelázquezCentro de Estudios Multidisciplinarios de Zonas Costeras (CEMZOC), Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.
A AbbehusenUniversidade Católica do Salvador, Centro de Ecologia e Conservação animal, ECOA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
E Guerra-CastroEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
N SimoesLaboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera, Laboratorios Nacionales, CONACYT, Mexico.
M Muciño-ReyesLaboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera, Laboratorios Nacionales, CONACYT, Mexico.
J R Souza FilhoInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano - IFBAIANO, Bahia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban tourist beach ecosystems provide the essential service of recreation. These ecosystems also support critical ecological functions where biodiversity conservation is not usually a priority. The sudden lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic created a unique opportunity to evaluate the effects of human absence in these urban-coastal ecosystems. This study examined bioindicators from 29 urban tourist beaches in seven Latin-American countries and assesses their response to lockdown about some relevant anthropogenic stressors such as pollution, noise, human activities, and user density. The presence of animals and plants, as well as the intensity of stressors, were assessed through a standardized protocol during lockdown conditions. Additionally, the environmental conditions of the beaches before and during lockdown were qualitatively compared using multivariate non-parametric statistics. We found notable positive changes in biological components and a clear decrease in human stressors on almost all the beaches. Dune vegetation increased on most sites. Similarly, high burrow densities of ghost crabs were observed on beaches, except those where cleaning activity persisted. Because of the lockdown, there was an exceptionally low frequency of beach users, which in turn reduced litter, noise and unnatural odors. The observed patterns suggest that tourist beaches can be restored to natural settings relatively quickly. We propose several indicators to measure changes in beaches once lockdown is relaxed. Adequate conservation strategies will render the recreational service of tourist beaches more environmental-friendly.

Indexed as

BioindicatorsCoastal biodiversityCoronavirusStressorsTourist beachesWildlife conservation

Identifiers

PMID36533087
PMCPMC9746931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.