Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532985›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Organization measures in the Enhanced Baking Tray Task.

Antonietta Argiuolo, Federica Somma, Paolo Bartolomeo, Onofrio Gigliotta, Michela Ponticorvo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonietta ArgiuoloNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory Orazio Miglino, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Federica SommaNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory Orazio Miglino, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paolo BartolomeoCNRS, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Onofrio GigliottaNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory Orazio Miglino, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Michela PonticorvoNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory Orazio Miglino, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The ecological assessment and the analysis of spatial organization behaviors, like the organization of objects in an empty space, in clinical and neurotypical conditions, is crucial. The Enhanced-Baking Tray Task (E-BTT) is as simple as that - placing objects inside a frame as evenly as possible, as if they were "cookies" to be baked in the oven. The E-BTT is the enhanced version of a task for neglect assessment, the Baking Tray Task, and has the advantage to register the coordinates of each object and their temporal order, meaning that it is easy to reconstruct the sequence of their placement. This sequence could be further analyzed, and, in this paper, we aim to do that with a series of indexes. Moreover, since they investigate the visual search organization of the sequence itself, their validity will be tested with a convergent measure of subjective organization. Methods: Therefore, we asked 100 observers (76 women) to evaluate the subjective organization of each of 97 E-BTT plots, on a scale that ranged from 0 = not at all to 100 = well organized. Results: A multiple regression model showed a significant association between subjective organization ratings (dependent variable) and Intersection rate, Total time of performance and distance to both optimal sequences (independent variables). Discussion: Therefore the above-mentioned indexes can be considered measures of the overall organization in the E-BTT.

Indexed as

Baking Tray TaskE-Baking Tray Taskorganizationspatial cognitionvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID36532985
PMCPMC9751454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.