ArticleCureus2022
Evaluating Critical Appraisal Skills by Introducing Journal Clubs to Preclinical Dental Students Using the Assessing Competency in Evidence-Based Medicine (ACE) Tool Through Pre and Post-testing.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Professional experiences with journal club implementation in postgraduate nursing: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Implementation of Chief Complaint-Based Clinical Reasoning Training in Periodontal Internships.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Assessing Medical Students' Perception of Implementing Journal Club Activities: A Qualitative Study.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The ineffective utilization of journal clubs (JCs) for pre-clinical dental students has led to a lack of research into their effectiveness in developing skills such as critical reasoning and evidence-based medicine (EBM) practice. Therefore, we have implemented JCs in first-year undergraduate dental students and measured their effectiveness using the integrated Assessing Competency in Evidence-Based Medicine (ACE) tool. Methodology We conducted a quasi-experimental study where EBM was included in the curriculum for pre-clinical students as a hybrid model with a year-long blended learning approach. The 50-student class was divided into five groups of 10 students, with each group participating in seven JCs related to the physiology curriculum. After conducting critical analysis in self-directed learning sessions, students created interactive PowerPoint presentations followed by discussion. Instructors offered feedback after each session based on 1-2 levels in Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model. Inferential statistics were used for comparative analysis of the ACE tool pre- and post-test using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A linear trend in median score from 6 in the pre-test to 9 in the post-test was detected using the box and whisker plot. Using paired sample t-test, the mean difference (95% confidence interval) between the pre-test and post-test responses was -3.14 (-2.32 to -3.96) (p < 0.001). In terms of the post-test responses, each item's difficulty index ranged from 0.3 to 0.9. Internal reliability was in the acceptable range of >0.15 (range = 0.5-0.18). The item discriminatory index was in the range of 0.8 to >0.2. Cronbach's alpha was 0.64, which was deemed acceptable. Conclusions Our results show that pre-clinical dentistry students appreciated the use of JCs to improve active learning, critical appraisal, analytical, and decision-making skills. The 15-item ACE measure is a useful and reliable tool for assessing dentistry students' EBM proficiency in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.