ArticleCureus2022
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy and Cortical Biopsy in Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is endoscopic third ventriculostomy a viable treatment option for normal pressure hydrocephalus? A systematic review.Surgical neurology international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) has conventionally been treated by placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. However, it can also be treated with a less invasive technique, an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence on the characteristics of NPH patients who are most likely to benefit from ETV. This study seeks to identify if patients at risk of dementia with NPH should be candidates for an ETV. Methodology Thirty-six NPH patients who underwent ETV at two institutions between July 2007 and December 2014 were pre-surgically assessed for various risk factors. At the time of ETV, a cortical biopsy was obtained and assessed for plaques consistent with dementia. Post-procedure, patients were followed and assessed for symptoms such as gait improvement, headache, memory problems, incontinence, and dementia. ETV success was defined as an improvement in gait. Results The mean age of patients with successful ETVs was 65.8 ± 6.0 versus 74.5 ± 7.0 for failed ETVs. Sixty-seven percent of patients with negative biopsies showed gait improvement by the final follow-up appointment as compared to only 33% of patients with positive biopsies (p>0.05). Younger age was correlated with successful ETV (p=.003). Memory disturbance (p<0.05) and incontinence (p<0.05) after surgery were both associated with a lack of gait improvement at the final follow-up. Conclusion Biopsy was not a significant predictor of ETV success; however, there was a correlation between younger age and ETV success. Additional studies are required to determine if there is a relationship between cortical biopsy findings and ETV success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.