Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532895›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2022

[Ranking of immunization programs in Latin America, 2019Ranking dos programas de imunização na América Latina, 2019].

María Fernanda Rombini, Romina Paola Mauas, Analía Urueña

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Ranking of immunization programs in Latin America, 2020Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

María Fernanda RombiniCentro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles Universidad Isalud Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina Centro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles, Universidad Isalud, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Romina Paola MauasCentro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles Universidad Isalud Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina Centro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles, Universidad Isalud, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Analía UrueñaCentro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles Universidad Isalud Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina Centro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles, Universidad Isalud, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To establish a ranking of national immunization programs in Latin America that compares the various realities, identifies challenges and unachieved goals, and encourages countries to search for strategies to overcome the obstacles they face. Methods: Ten countries with the most innovative national vaccination schedules (NVCs) were selected. Information published on official websites of ministries of health, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) were used, as well as interviews with experts from each country. A ranking was constructed, based on domains linked to the 2019 NVC (vaccinations given at different life stages, influenza vaccination, and vaccination in special situations); vaccination coverage in 2018; and programmatic aspects. Results: The general ranking is led by Chile and Panama, due to vaccination in the first and second year of life. They are followed by Argentina, Uruguay, and Costa Rica, which stand out for vaccination of other groups, influenza vaccination, and programmatic aspects. Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico have more delays in their NVCs, as well as programmatic gaps and lower vaccination coverages. Finally, Paraguay and Peru have similar deficiencies and bigger information gaps. However, when the domains are analyzed individually, the ranking changes and the same pattern is not repeated. Conclusions: This is the first ranking of national immunization programs in Latin America that highlights strengths and weaknesses in each country. The periodicity of this exercise will be key when comparing the evolution and positioning of these programs over time.

Indexed as

Immunization programsLatin Americavaccination coveragevacination

Identifiers

PMID36532895
PMCPMC9749871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.