Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532880›Full record

ArticleNeural computing & applications2023

A penalty-based algorithm proposal for engineering optimization problems.

Gulin Zeynep Oztas, Sabri Erdem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computing & applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gulin Zeynep OztasDepartment of Business Administration, Pamukkale University, 20160 Denizli, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6901-6559
Sabri ErdemDepartment of Business, Dokuz Eylul University, 35390 İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6766-3202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a population-based evolutionary computation model for solving continuous constrained nonlinear optimization problems. The primary goal is achieving better solutions in a specific problem type, regardless of metaphors and similarities. The proposed algorithm assumes that candidate solutions interact with each other to have better fitness values. The interaction between candidate solutions is limited with the closest neighbors by considering the Euclidean distance. Furthermore, Tabu Search Algorithm and Elitism selection approach inspire the memory usage of the proposed algorithm. Besides, this algorithm is structured on the principle of the multiplicative penalty approach that considers satisfaction rates, the total deviations of constraints, and the objective function value to handle continuous constrained problems very well. The performance of the algorithm is evaluated with real-world engineering design optimization benchmark problems that belong to the most used cases by evolutionary optimization researchers. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm produces satisfactory results compared to the other algorithms published in the literature. The primary purpose of this study is to provide an algorithm that reaches the best-known solution values rather than duplicating existing algorithms through a new metaphor. We constructed the proposed algorithm with the best combination of features to achieve better solutions. Different from similar algorithms, constrained engineering problems are handled in this study. Thus, it aims to prove that the proposed algorithm gives better results than similar algorithms and other algorithms developed in the literature.

Indexed as

Constrained nonlinear optimizationEngineering benchmark problemsEvolutionary computationMetaheuristicsNatural factsNature-inspired optimization algorithms

Identifiers

PMID36532880
PMCPMC9735093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.