Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532875›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2023

Intranasal delivery of darunavir improves brain drug concentrations in mice for effective HIV treatment.

Asit Kumar, Lina Zhou, Sandip Godse, Namita Sinha, Dejian Ma, Keyur Parmar, Santosh Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asit KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Lina ZhouDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Sandip GodseDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Namita SinhaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Dejian MaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Keyur ParmarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), which reduces the HIV replication in chronically HIV-infected patients, HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) persists in the brain. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the major barrier for the penetration of drugs including antiretrovirals, limiting the drug penetration to the brain. In the present study, we have shown improved brain drug concentration in mice for darunavir (DRV), an FDA-approved drug, using an intranasal (IN) delivery method that bypasses the BBB. Here, we compared the time-dependent biodistribution of DRV at two different concentrations, high (25 mg/kg) and low (2.5 mg/kg), using two administration routes intravenous (IV) and intranasal (IN) in brain, liver, lungs, and plasma. Compared with IV administration, IN administration demonstrated a significantly improved DRV penetration in the brain at both low and high DRV concentrations (IV vs IN: at 2.5 mg/kg: 6.91 ± 1.69 ng/g vs 12.08 ± 2.91 ng/g, at 25 mg/kg: 12.84 ± 2.88 ng/g vs 19.74 ± 1.80 ng/g). As expected, IN administration showed significantly lower DRV concentrations in plasma (IV vs IN: at 2.5 mg/kg: 81.37 ± 22.04 ng/g vs 19.91 ± 12.65 ng/g, at 25 mg/kg: 899.12 ± 136.93 ng/g vs 320.56 ± 40.04 ng/g) and liver (IV vs IN: at 2.5 mg/kg: 118.39 ± 28.13 ng/g vs 29.27 ± 4.17 ng/g at 25 mg/kg: 1085.18 ± 255.0 ng/g vs 833.83 ± 242.4 ng/g). The IN administration did not show significant change in lungs compared to the IV administration. As a result, these findings suggest that the IN route can increase the DRV level in the brain, suppressing HIV in the brain reservoirs. Additionally, it could also reduce off-target effects, especially in peripheral organs.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral drugBiodistributionDarunavirHIVIntranasalIntravenous

Identifiers

PMID36532875
PMCPMC9747527
OpenAlexW4312065124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.