Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532866›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2022

Synthetic opioids: a review and clinical update.

Abu Shafi, Alex J Berry, Harry Sumnall, David M Wood, Derek K Tracy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The nitazene epidemic in Estonia: a first report.European journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Opioid system and related ligands: from the past to future perspectives.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Abu ShafiSouth West London and Saint George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Alex J BerryDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Harry SumnallLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
David M WoodClinical Toxicology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Derek K TracyWest London NHS Trust, Trust Headquarters, 1 Armstrong Way, Southall UB2 4SD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-9407
King's College London · GBLiverpool John Moores University · GBSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBWest London Mental Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'opioids' refers to both the natural compounds ('opiates') which are extracted from the opium poppy plant (

Indexed as

fentanilsfentanyllaboratory testingnew psychoactive substancesNPSopioid crisisoverdosepublic healthsynthetic opioids

Identifiers

PMID36532866
PMCPMC9747888
OpenAlexW4312067570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.