Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532853›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

The Effects of Adding Di-Tan Decoction (DTD) and/or Electroacupuncture (EA) to Standard Swallowing Rehabilitation Training (SRT) for Improving Poststroke Dysphagia (PSD): A Pilot, Single-Centred, Randomized Trial.

Xiangzhi Shao, Bing Chen, Lielie Zhu, Lili Zhu, Jinyihui Zheng, Xinyu Pu, Jiajun Chen, Jianning Xia, Xinming Wu, Jiacheng Zhang and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangzhi ShaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Bing ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9389-3327
Lielie ZhuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7263-3224
Lili ZhuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Jinyihui ZhengDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Xinyu PuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Jiajun ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Jianning XiaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Xinming WuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Jiacheng ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Dengchong WuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of adding Di-tan decoction (DTD) and/or electroacupuncture (EA) to standard swallowing rehabilitation training (SRT) on improving PSD. Methods: In total, 80 PSD patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DTD, EA, DTD + EA or control group at a 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 ratio. All patients received basic treatment and standard SRT. The DTD group received DTD orally, the EA group received EA, the DTD + EA group received both DTD and EA simultaneously, and the control group received only basic treatment and standard SRT. The interventions lasted for 4 weeks. The outcome measurements included the Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) and Swallowing-Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL), performed and scored from baseline to 2, 4, and 6 weeks after intervention, and the Videofluoroscopic Dysphagia Scale (VDS), scored at baseline and 4 weeks after intervention. Scores were compared over time by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) among all groups. Interactions between interventions were explored using factorial design analysis. Results: (1) The effective rates (ERs) for PSD treatment were higher in the DTD, EA and DTD + EA groups than in the control group (all Conclusions: Adding DTD or EA to SRT can better improve PSD than applying SRT alone. Adding DTD and EA simultaneously can accelerate and amplify the recovery of swallowing function versus DTD or EA alone, and both are effective and safe treatments, alone or jointly, for PSD and are a powerful supplement to routine treatments.

Identifiers

PMID36532853
PMCPMC9754838
OpenAlexW4311881980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.