ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Enhanced mechanisms of pooling and channel attention for deep learning feature maps.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-based attention-guided deep learning combined with radiomics to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A Transformer-Based Neural Network for Gait Prediction in Lower Limb Exoskeleton Robots Using Plantar Force.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pooling function is vital for deep neural networks (DNNs). The operation is to generalize the representation of feature maps and progressively cut down the spatial size of feature maps to optimize the computing consumption of the network. Furthermore, the function is also the basis for the computer vision attention mechanism. However, as a matter of fact, pooling is a down-sampling operation, which makes the feature-map representation approximately to small translations with the summary statistic of adjacent pixels. As a result, the function inevitably leads to information loss more or less. In this article, we propose a fused max-average pooling (FMAPooling) operation as well as an improved channel attention mechanism (FMAttn) by utilizing the two pooling functions to enhance the feature representation for DNNs. Basically, the methods are to enhance multiple-level features extracted by max pooling and average pooling respectively. The effectiveness of the proposals is verified with VGG, ResNet, and MobileNetV2 architectures on CIFAR10/100 and ImageNet100. According to the experimental results, the FMAPooling brings up to 1.63% accuracy improvement compared with the baseline model; the FMAttn achieves up to 2.21% accuracy improvement compared with the previous channel attention mechanism. Furthermore, the proposals are extensible and could be embedded into various DNN models easily, or take the place of certain structures of DNNs. The computation burden introduced by the proposals is negligible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.