Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532697›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental impact assessment review2023

Perceptions of change in the environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for environmental policy.

N Hidalgo-Triana, A Picornell, S Reyes, G Circella, H Ribeiro, A E Bates, J Rojo, P B Pearman, J M Artes Vivancos, S Nautiyal and 22 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental impact assessment review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

N Hidalgo-TrianaUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
A PicornellUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
S ReyesUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Department of Geography (Geographic Analysis Research Group), 29071 Málaga, Spain.
G CircellaInstitute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, USA.
H RibeiroDepartment of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Plannings, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto and Earth Sciences Institute (ICT), Pole of the Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal.
A E BatesDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
J RojoDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy and Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
P B PearmanDepartment of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia 48940, Spain.
J M Artes VivancosDepartment of Chemistry, Kennedy College of Sciences, UMass Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
S NautiyalCentre for Ecological Economics and Natural Resources (CEENR), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Nagarabhavi, Bengaluru 560 072, India.
F Q BrearleyDepartment of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK.
J PereñaUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
M FerragudUniversity of Valencia, Faculty of Sciences, Spain.
A Monroy-ColínUniversity of Extremadura, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Vegetal Biology, Ecology and Earth Science (Botany Area), 06006 Badajoz, Spain.
J M Maya-ManzanoUniversity of Valencia, Faculty of Sciences, Spain.
J M A Sènami OuachinouLaboratoire de Botanique et Ecologie Végétale, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Universite d'Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
A E Salvo-TierraTechnical Director Chair Climate Change on UMA, University of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
C AntunesDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Development & Institute of Earth Sciences - ICT, University of Évora, Evora, Portugal.
M Trigo-PérezUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
T NavarroUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
P JaramilloCharles Darwin Research Station, Charles Darwin Foundation, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, 200102, Ecuador.
J OterosDepartment of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence CeiA3, Andalusian Inter-University Institute for Earth System IISTA, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
A CharalampopoulosDepartment of Ecology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
O I KalantziDepartment of Environment, University of the Aegean, Mytilene 81100, Greece.
H FreitasUniversity of Coimbra, Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal.
J ŠčevkováComenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Botany, Révová 39, 811 02 Bratislava, Slovakia.
M ZanollaUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
A MarranoPhoenix Bioinformatics, Fremont, CA, USA.
O CominoEstudios de Flora y Vegetación SL (EFYVE), 29580 Cártama, Málaga, Spain.
J J RoldánUniversity of Málaga, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Physiology (Botany Area), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
A F AlcántaraCentro de Cooperación del Mediterráneo de UICN, 29590 Campanillas, Málaga, Spain.
A DamialisDepartment of Ecology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Universidad de Málaga · ESUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJUniversitat de València · ESBasque Centre for Climate Change · ESComenius University Bratislava · SKInstitute for Social and Economic Change · INManchester Metropolitan University · GBPhoenix Bioinformatics · USUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Extremadura · ESUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Évora · PTUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · USUniversity of the Aegean · GRUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 lockdown measures have impacted the environment with both positive and negative effects. However, how human populations have perceived such changes in the natural environment and how they may have changed their daily habits have not been yet thoroughly evaluated. The objectives of this work were to investigate (1) the social perception of the environmental changes produced by the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and the derived change in habits in relation to i) waste management, energy saving, and sustainable consumption, ii) mobility, iii) social inequalities, iv) generation of noise, v) utilization of natural spaces, and, vi) human population perception towards the future, and (2) the associations of these potential new habits with various socio-demographic variables. First, a SWOT analysis identified strengths (S), weaknesses (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) generated by the pandemic lockdown measures. Second, a survey based on the aspects of the SWOT was administered among 2370 adults from 37 countries during the period from February to September 2021. We found that the short-term positive impacts on the natural environment were generally well recognized. In contrast, longer-term negative effects arise, but they were often not reported by the survey participants, such as greater production of plastic waste derived from health safety measures, and the increase in e-commerce use, which can displace small storefront businesses. We were able to capture a mismatch between perceptions and the reported data related to visits to natural areas, and generation of waste. We found that age and country of residence were major contributors in shaping the survey participants ´answers, which highlights the importance of government management strategies to address current and future environmental problems. Enhanced positive perceptions of the environment and ecosystems, combined with the understanding that livelihood sustainability, needs to be prioritized and would reinforce environmental protection policies to create greener cities. Moreover, new sustainable jobs in combination with more sustainable human habits represent an opportunity to reinforce environmental policy.

Indexed as

Emerging environmental impactsNatural environmentPandemicPerceptionSocial behaviours

Identifiers

PMID36532697
PMCPMC9744709
OpenAlexW4311968925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.