Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532556›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

A pathway towards the development and evolution of consumer behavior: Policy directions for sustainable development and improvement of nutrition.

Fang Su, Jiangbo Chang, Xing Zhang, Shah Fahad, Shimza Bint Aslam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fang SuSchool of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Jiangbo ChangSchool of Economics and Management, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Xing ZhangSchool of Economics and Management, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China.
Shah FahadSchool of Economics and Management, Leshan Normal University, Leshan, China.
Shimza Bint AslamInstitute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Hainan University · CNNorthwest University · CNShaanxi University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKZhengzhou University of Light Industry · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The virtuality, concealment, uncertainty and complexity of online trading make the online food trading market have security risks, while the lack of information, information asymmetry and imperfect market system make the "lemon problem" in the market increasingly obvious. Methods: In order to clearly understand and manage the "lemon problem" in the online food trading market, we built an evolutionary game model involving the seller, buyers and online food trading platform, deeply analyzed the formation process of the "lemon problem" in the online food trading market, and revealed the influencing factors and effects of each subject's strategy choice from the perspectives of subsidy, punishment, cost, and benefit. Results: Findings of this study reveal that: (1) In the online food trading market, the strategy of the seller, buyer and platform will be stable in six situations, and the "lemon problem" will emerge with the development and evolution of the online food trading market. (2) The strategy of each subject in the online food trading market will be affected by variables like cost difference between positive performance and negative performance of the seller, punishment from the buyer with positive participation to the seller with negative performance, subsidy from the platform with positive regulation to the seller with positive performance, etc., and different factors have different influence directions and degrees on the subject strategy. (3) In the online food trading market, cost, punishment, subsidy and benefit have different effects on the subject's strategy. Among them, cost and cost difference have the most significant impact on the subject's strategy, followed by punishment and benefit difference, and subsidy and additional benefit have less impact on the subject's strategy. Discussion: Based on our study findings, it is proposed that by constructing a complete and standardized system of online food trading market from the aspects of examination and verification institution, reward and punishment institution, and supervision institution, it will be able to provide reference for managing the "lemon problem" in the online food trading market, promoting the sustainable development of the market, and ensuring the safety of online food.

Indexed as

evolutionary gameformation mechanisminfluencing factorslemon problemonline food trading marketsustainable food production

Identifiers

PMID36532556
PMCPMC9755743
OpenAlexW4311185747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.