Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532501›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Probiotic supplementation during pregnancy alters gut microbial networks of pregnant women and infants.

Ting Huang, Zhe Li, Kian Deng Tye, Sze Ngai Chan, Xiaomei Tang, Huijuan Luo, Dongju Wang, Juan Zhou, Xia Duan, Xiaomin Xiao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06241222 (Origin of the Neonatal Gut Microbiota and Probiotic Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06241222 nacompletednot on this map

Origin of the Neonatal Gut Microbiota and Probiotic Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorThird Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsMicrobiotaArmsProbiotic Blend Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhe LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Kian Deng TyeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sze Ngai ChanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomei TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Huijuan LuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Dongju WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Juan ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xia DuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomin XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Probiotic supplementation has been popular and widespread, yet we still lack a comprehensive understanding of how probiotic supplementation during pregnancy affects the gut microbial networks of pregnant women and infants. In this study, we firstly used network analysis to compare the gut microbiota of pregnant women with and without probiotic supplementation, as well as their infants. Methods: Thirty-one pairs of healthy pregnant women and infants were recruited and randomly divided into the probiotic group (15 mother-infant pairs) and the control group (16 mother-infant pairs). Pregnant women in the probiotic group consumed combined probiotics from 32 weeks to delivery. Fecal samples were collected from pregnant women and infants at several time points. Gut microbiota was evaluated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Intestinal microbial network and topological properties were performed using the molecular ecological network analysis. Results: No significant difference was found between the probiotic and control groups on the microbial alpha and beta diversity. As the gestational age increased, the total links, average degree, average clustering coefficient, robustness, and the proportion of positive correlations were increased in pregnant women with probiotics administration. In contrast, these indices were decreased in infants in the probiotic group. Conclusion: Probiotic supplement does not change the microbial diversity of pregnant women and infants, but significantly alters the intestinal microbial network structure and properties. Although pregnant women have more complicated and stable networks after probiotic administration, their infants have less stable networks.

Indexed as

16S rRNAcommunity stabilitygut microbiotamicrobial networkpregnancyprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID36532501
PMCPMC9751803
OpenAlexW4310524422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.