Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

An AI-based approach for detecting cells and microbial byproducts in low volume scanning electron microscope images of biofilms.

Dilanga Abeyrathna, Md Ashaduzzaman, Milind Malshe, Jawaharraj Kalimuthu, Venkataramana Gadhamshetty, Parvathi Chundi, Mahadevan Subramaniam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dilanga AbeyrathnaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, United States.
Md AshaduzzamanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, United States.
Milind MalsheDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, United States.
Jawaharraj KalimuthuCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Venkataramana GadhamshettyCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States.
Parvathi ChundiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, United States.
Mahadevan SubramaniamDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbially induced corrosion (MIC) of metal surfaces caused by biofilms has wide-ranging consequences. Analysis of biofilm images to understand the distribution of morphological components in images such as microbial cells, MIC byproducts, and metal surfaces non-occluded by cells can provide insights into assessing the performance of coatings and developing new strategies for corrosion prevention. We present an automated approach based on self-supervised deep learning methods to analyze Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images and detect cells and MIC byproducts. The proposed approach develops models that can successfully detect cells, MIC byproducts, and non-occluded surface areas in SEM images with a high degree of accuracy using a low volume of data while requiring minimal expert manual effort for annotating images. We develop deep learning network pipelines involving both contrastive (Barlow Twins) and non-contrastive (MoCoV2) self-learning methods and generate models to classify image patches containing three labels-cells, MIC byproducts, and non-occluded surface areas. Our experimental results based on a dataset containing seven grayscale SEM images show that both Barlow Twin and MoCoV2 models outperform the state-of-the-art supervised learning models achieving prediction accuracy increases of approximately 8 and 6%, respectively. The self-supervised pipelines achieved this superior performance by requiring experts to annotate only ~10% of the input data. We also conducted a qualitative assessment of the proposed approach using experts and validated the classification outputs generated by the self-supervised models. This is perhaps the first attempt toward the application of self-supervised learning to classify biofilm image components and our results show that self-supervised learning methods are highly effective for this task while minimizing the expert annotation effort.

Indexed as

Barlow twinscontrastive learningdeep learningmicrobially induced corrosionmicroscopy imagesmomentum contrastscanning electron microscopeself-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID36532463
PMCPMC9751328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.