Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532459›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Functional responses of key marine bacteria to environmental change - toward genetic counselling for coastal waters.

Jarone Pinhassi, Hanna Farnelid, Sandra Martínez García, Eva Teira, Pierre E Galand, Ingrid Obernosterer, Christopher Quince, Maria Vila-Costa, Josep M Gasol, Daniel Lundin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of Light Regime onJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jarone PinhassiCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Hanna FarnelidCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Sandra Martínez GarcíaDepartamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Eva TeiraDepartamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Pierre E GalandCNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogéochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Sorbonne Université, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.
Ingrid ObernostererCNRS, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Microbienne (LOMIC), Sorbonne Université, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.
Christopher QuinceEarlham Institute, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Maria Vila-CostaIDAEA-CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep M GasolInstitut de Ciències del Mar-CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel LundinCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Anders F AnderssonDepartment of Gene Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matthias LabrenzLeibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Rostock, Germany.
Lasse RiemannMarine Biology Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coastal ecosystems deteriorate globally due to human-induced stress factors, like nutrient loading and pollution. Bacteria are critical to marine ecosystems, e.g., by regulating nutrient cycles, synthesizing vitamins, or degrading pollutants, thereby providing essential ecosystem services ultimately affecting economic activities. Yet, until now bacteria are overlooked both as mediators and indicators of ecosystem health, mainly due to methodological limitations in assessing bacterial ecosystem functions. However, these limitations are largely overcome by the advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics methods for characterizing the genetics that underlie functional traits of key bacterial populations - "key" in providing important ecosystem services, being abundant, or by possessing high metabolic rates. It is therefore timely to analyze and define the functional responses of bacteria to human-induced effects on coastal ecosystem health. We posit that categorizing the responses of key marine bacterial populations to changes in environmental conditions through modern microbial oceanography methods will allow establishing the nascent field of genetic counselling for our coastal waters. This requires systematic field studies of linkages between functional traits of key bacterial populations and their ecosystem functions in coastal seas, complemented with systematic experimental analyses of the responses to different stressors. Research and training in environmental management along with dissemination of results and dialogue with societal actors are equally important to ensure the role of bacteria is understood as fundamentally important for coastal ecosystems. Using the responses of microorganisms as a tool to develop genetic counselling for coastal ecosystems can ultimately allow for integrating bacteria as indicators of environmental change.

Indexed as

ecosystem servicemanagementmarine bacteriatraitswater quality

Identifiers

PMID36532459
PMCPMC9751014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.