Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532408›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

Virtual Reality Simulation: Evaluating an Experiential Tool for the Clinical Application of Pathophysiology.

Menaka Jayasundera, Mary Myers, Kumar Pandian, Gareth Gingell

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Menaka Jayasundera *Department of Medical Education, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX USA.
Mary Myers *Department of Medical Education, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-8108
Kumar Pandian *Department of Medical Education, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX USA.
Gareth Gingell *Department of Medical Education, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, TX USA.
Seton Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At our medical school, MS3 students experience minimal patient contact. Our research shows that virtual reality simulation (VRS) supports students' transition back to patient care by increasing post-intervention confidence in clinical decision-making, management, and patient communication. VRS shows potential to teach pathophysiology, and bridges clinical and basic science instruction.

Indexed as

Clinical decision-makingDebriefingPathophysiologyTechnology-enhanced learningVirtual reality simulation

Identifiers

PMID36532408
PMCPMC9755448
OpenAlexW4309899970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.