Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532346›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Serological survey of SARS-CoV-2 in companion animals in China.

Aiping Wang, Xifang Zhu, Yumei Chen, Yaning Sun, Hongliang Liu, Peiyang Ding, Jingming Zhou, Yankai Liu, Chao Liang, Jiajia Yin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ultrafast and high-throughput immunoassay assay to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in dogs and cats.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  6. Improving the ONE HEALTH approach: a lesson from SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aiping WangSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xifang ZhuSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yumei ChenSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yaning SunHenan Zhongze Biological Engineering Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China.
Hongliang LiuSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Peiyang DingSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jingming ZhouSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yankai LiuSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chao LiangSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiajia YinSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Gaiping ZhangSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNHenan Science and Technology Department · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be transmitted from human to companion animals. The national wide serological surveillance against SARS-CoV-2 was conducted among pet animals, mainly in cats and dogs, 1 year after the first outbreak of COVID-19 in China. All sera were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using an indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of spike protein. This late survey takes advantage of the short duration of the serological response in these animals to track recent episode of transmission. A total of 20,592 blood samples were obtained from 25 provinces across 7 geographical regions. The overall seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in cats was 0.015% (2/13397; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.0, 0.1). The virus infections in cats were only detected in Central (Hubei, 0.375%) and Eastern China (Zhejiang, 0.087%) with a seroprevalence estimated at 0.090 and 0.020%, respectively. In dogs, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 0.014% (1/7159; 95% CI: 0.0, 0.1) in the entire nation, seropositive samples were limited to Beijing (0.070%) of Northern China with a prevalence of 0.054%. No seropositive cases were discovered in other geographic regions, nor in other companion animals analyzed in this study. These data reveal the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in companion animals, although transmission of the virus to domestic cats and dogs is low in China, continuous monitoring is helpful for the better understand of the virus transmission status and the effect on animals.

Indexed as

colloidal gold test stripscompanion animalsELISASARS-CoV-2seroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID36532346
PMCPMC9748147
OpenAlexW4310995360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.