Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tobias Rohrmann, Peter Praus, Tanja Proctor, Anastasia Benedyk, Heike Tost, Oliver Hennig, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, Anna-Sophia Wahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tobias RohrmannCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter PrausCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Tanja ProctorInstitute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anastasia BenedykCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Heike TostCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Oliver HennigCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas Meyer-LindenbergCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Anna-Sophia WahlCentral Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Central Institute of Mental Health · DEHeidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine became essential in maintaining diagnostic procedures and treatment in psychiatry. However, it is still an open question if telemedicine is a feasible treatment option for all groups of psychiatric patients alike. This prospective monocentric observational trial was conducted to assess the general applicability of telemedical treatment in a naturalistic psychiatric outpatient cohort and to identify groups of disorders and clusters of psychopathology that respond particularly well to telemedical treatment considering sociodemographic characteristics and patients' perspectives. Methods: Patients were recruited April 2020-April 2021 and asked to fill out the WHO-5 and the SCL-90R at baseline, after 4-6 and 8-12 weeks and a feedback-survey. Additionally, medical records, psychopathology, psychosocial functioning, and socio-demographic data were analyzed. Primary outcomes were well-being, psychopathology and functioning during treatment. Secondly, diagnostic groups and psychopathology linked to a superior treatment-response were determined with respect to patients' subjective experiences. Results: Out of 1.385 patients, 254-mostly with hyperkinetic (35.3%) and depressive disorders (24.6%)-took part. Well-being and SCL-90R total scores improved substantially (both Conclusion: Telemedicine is an effective treatment for patients with depression under naturalistic conditions. Telemedical consultations are a simple and reliable way of monitoring symptom severity and directing treatment choices during the treatment of depressive disorders. Patients with depression benefited more from telemedical treatment compared to participants with chronic non-episodic psychiatric disorders. Future research needs to concentrate on improving telemedical treatment options suited for the latter conditions. Psychiatric telemedicine yielded overall high degrees of satisfaction among users.

Indexed as

chronic disordersdepressionpsychiatrytelemedicinewellbeing

Identifiers

PMID36532188
PMCPMC9751940
OpenAlexW4311082211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.