ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Reliability in measurement of three-dimensional anterior pelvic plane orientation by registration with an inertial measurement unit.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is strongly challenging to obtain functional movement of the pelvis based on the three-dimensional (3D) dynamic anterior pelvic plane (APP) orientation information. This study provided the 3D APP orientation measurement technique by registration with an inertial measurement unit (IMU), and its reliability was tested. The local coordinate systems of the APP and the IMU sensor were registered using two images of the pelvic part from the frontal and left sagittal views in a neutral standing posture. Then, the measurement errors in the APP orientation were analyzed by comparing the values obtained from manually measured four points in the IMU sensor and the known exact values in 10 different postures. Moreover, the errors between values obtained from manually measured three anatomical points and the known exact values were also compared. The average errors were quite small (less than 0.6°) when measuring from three anatomical points and were acceptable (1.6°-3.4°) when measuring from four points in the IMU sensor. These results indicate that the measurement of APP direction using four points in the IMU sensor could be considered reliable in terms of intra-participant and inter-participant. The present technique to register the IMU sensor position and the APP direction by taking X-ray images from the frontal and sagittal directions can be fundamental information to measure the APP direction during dynamic motion when the IMU position is obtained from the IMU sensor data instead of the four-point location information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.