Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532105›Full record

ArticleApplied acoustics. Acoustique applique. Angewandte Akustik2021

Indoor soundscapes at home during the COVID-19 lockdown in London - Part I: Associations between the perception of the acoustic environment, occupantś activity and well-being.

Simone Torresin, Rossano Albatici, Francesco Aletta, Francesco Babich, Tin Oberman, Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga, Jian Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied acoustics. Acoustique applique. Angewandte Akustik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sons al Balcó: A Comparative Analysis of WASN-BasedSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Sound of a Circular City: Towards a Circularity-Driven Quietness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone TorresinDepartment of Civil Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Italy.
Rossano AlbaticiDepartment of Civil Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Italy.
Francesco AlettaUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, London, UK.
Francesco BabichInstitute for Renewable Energy, Eurac Research, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
Tin ObermanUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, London, UK.
Agnieszka Elzbieta StawinogaManagement and Committees, Eurac Research, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
Jian KangUCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a result of the adoption of worldwide lockdown measures, the home environment has become the place where all the daily activities are taking place for many people. In these changed social and acoustical contexts, we wanted to evaluate the perception of the indoor acoustic environment in relation to traditional and new activities performed at home, i.e., relaxation, and working from home (WFH). Taking London as a case study, the present paper presents the results of an online survey administered to 464 home workers in January 2021. The survey utilized a previously developed model for the assessment of indoor soundscapes to describe the affective responses to the acoustic environments in a perceptual space defined by

Indexed as

Acoustic designCOVID-19Indoor environmental qualityIndoor soundscapeWell-beingWFH

Identifiers

PMID36532105
PMCPMC9746886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.