ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Outcomes after a Uterine-Sparing Approach to Essure Contraceptive Device Removal.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: To analyze long-term effectiveness of a conservative, uterine-sparing approach to laparoscopic Essure removal. Specific outcomes of interest include patient satisfaction, symptom resolution, and subsequent surgical intervention. Methods: A retrospective case series and follow-up survey. Patients who underwent laparoscopic Essure removal without concomitant hysterectomy between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 were identified. Greater than 18 months after removal participants completed a survey assessing outcomes. Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent conservative Essure removal and there were 19 survey respondents. Among survey respondents, the mean length of time from Essure placement to removal was 56.7 months (range 5 - 117), and the mean length of time from removal to survey administration was 48.3 months (range 23 - 63). The most frequently reported symptoms were pain (100%), bleeding (52.6%), headache (42.1%), and dyspareunia (42.1%). Methods for removal included laparoscopic salpingectomy (58.6%), a combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach (34.4%), and cornuectomy (6.9%). Regarding symptom improvement after Essure removal, 47.4% of patients reported total improvement, 36.8% reported almost total improvement, 5.3% reported some improvement, and 10.5% reported no improvement. Most patients (89.5%) reported satisfaction with their surgical results, and only two patients required subsequent surgical intervention for symptom management. Conclusions: Most patients in our cohort reported total or almost total improvement in symptoms almost two years after Essure removal, with low rates of reintervention. A uterine-sparing approach to Essure removal, using laparoscopic and hysteroscopic modalities, may be a feasible and effective approach to addressing Essure-attributed symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.