ArticleInnovations in systems and software engineering2022
Mental health issues assessment using tools during COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Innovations in systems and software engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Russian subjective and objective uncertainty stress (SOUS-14) scale: factor validity, internal reliability, and measurement invariance in university student sample.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Depression and Physical activity among cardiac patients undergone cardiac events: a correlational study.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 has brought distress among people as pandemic has impacted the globe not only economically or physically, but also psychologically by degrading their mental health. Several research were done in the past which tried to capture these issues but post-covid situation needs to be critically handled and analyzed so that corrective measures for cure and support can be taken. The current work is an attempt to observe the mental health issues (anxiety and depression) that occurred during the lockdown by combining a few pre-designed questionnaires. The online survey included 244 respondents (females = 126, males = 118) and when we thoroughly examined gender, age group, and occupational activity as three main factors, the results showed that female students aged 21-35 were affected more than male students of the same age group. In this study, we used a 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) as a depression screening instrument and discovered that 225 out of total respondents were depressed. Using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), a self-administered anxiety tool, we found 103 responders with mild, 87 with moderate, 12 with severe, and 42 with no anxiety symptoms. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) showed the symptoms of mental disorders where 68 individuals had mild, 85 had moderate, 37 had moderately severe, 12 had severe, and 42 had no symptoms. With the help of multiple linear regression analysis, demographic data were evaluated, and later results were compared between GDS-4, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 using correlation coefficients. This will help practitioners and individuals to focus on their physiological health and adopt diagnostic measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.