ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
An Explainable Statistical Method for Seizure Prediction Using Brain Functional Connectivity from EEG.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-Scale Synchronization Dynamics During Epileptic Seizures: A Patient-Independent EEG Network Analysis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research progress of epileptic seizure prediction methods based on EEG.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epilepsy is a group of chronic neurological disorders characterized by recurrent and abrupt seizures. The accurate prediction of seizures can reduce the burdens of this disorder. Now, existing studies use brain network features to classify patients' preictal or interictal states, enabling seizure prediction. However, most predicting methods are based on deep learning techniques, which have weak interpretability and high computational complexity. To address these issues, in this study, we proposed a novel two-stage statistical method that is interpretable and easy to compute. Methods: We used two datasets to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, including the well-known public dataset CHB-MIT. In the first stage, we estimated the dynamic brain functional connectivity network for each epoch. Then, in the second stage, we used the derived network predictor for seizure prediction. Results: We illustrated the results of our method in seizure prediction in two datasets separately. For the FH-PKU dataset, our approach achieved an AUC value of 0.963, a prediction sensitivity of 93.1%, and a false discovery rate of 7.7%. For the CHB-MIT dataset, our approach achieved an AUC value of 0.940, a prediction sensitivity of 93.0%, and a false discovery rate of 11.1%, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.