ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022
Application of the robot-assisted implantation in deep brain stimulation.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic systems in cranial surgery: a systematic review of accuracy, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-Assisted versus non-robotic frame-based deep brain stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of targeting accuracy and clinical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation: comparative insights with conventional techniques.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease : Accuracy, Workflow, Clinical Outcomes, and Safety.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- The Feasibility, Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Robotic arm vs. stereotactic frame in deep brain stimulation surgery for movement disorders: a retrospective cohort study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Neurosurgical robot-assisted transnasal endoscopic surgery in orbital-related diseases.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Potentiation of cortico-spinal output via targeted electrical stimulation of the motor thalamus.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Image-guided biopsy of intracranial lesions in children, with a small robotic device: a case series.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Computed tomography and structured light imaging guided orthopedic navigation puncture system: effective reduction of intraoperative image drift and mismatch.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- POTENTIATION OF CORTICO-SPINAL OUTPUT VIA TARGETED ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE MOTOR THALAMUS.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Novel application of robot-guided stereotactic technique on biopsy diagnosis of intracranial lesions.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This work aims to assess the accuracy of robotic assistance guided by a videometric tracker in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 30 DBS electrode implantations, assisted by the Remebot robotic system, with a novel frameless videometric registration workflow. Then we selected 30 PD patients who used stereotactic frame surgery to implant electrodes during the same period. For each electrode, accuracy was assessed using radial and axial error. Results: The average radial error of the robot-assisted electrode implantation was 1.28 ± 0.36 mm, and the average axial error was 1.20 ± 0.40 mm. No deaths or associated hemorrhages, infections or poor incision healing occurred. Conclusion: Robot-assisted implantation guided by a videometric tracker is accurate and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.